Overview
White Coat Waste Project is a taxpayer watchdog group representing more than 2 million liberty-lovers and animal-lovers who all agree: taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to pay over $20 billion every year for wasteful and cruel experiments on dogs, cats, monkeys and other animals.
Join the fight: because taxpayers have a right to know who’s paying the bills… and who’s cashing the checks.
Our Strategy
Investigate and analyze wasteful government spending on animal experiments
Educate a new generation of taxpayers on how their money is being wasted.
Build a diverse coalition of liberty-lovers, animal-lovers, doctors, scientists and bipartisan lawmakers to stop wasteful government spending on taxpayer-funded animal experiments
What They Are Saying
The White Coat Waste Project claims it was the first to point out that U.S. taxpayers were being used to fund the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The White Coat Waste Project, which exposes taxpayer funded animal experiments, has been leading efforts to defund the Wuhan Lab.
According to public documents compiled by the White Coat Waste Project and shared with Fox News, The Wuhan Institute of Virology has been involved with research funded by $7.1 million worth of U.S. government grants.
White Coat Waste Project is not a traditional animal advocacy organization, but one focused on what it says is government waste on testing — the kind of issue that could appeal to both fiscal conservatives and animal rights activists.
By targeting the public funding spigot, [WCW] has forged unlikely alliances in Washington, with left-leaning, Patagonia-clad “no blood on my hands” animal-rights activists locking arms with bowtie-and-blazer “drain the swamp” stalwarts of the right.
White Coat Waste Project's message also has infiltrated the federal government.
Many of these abuses and missteps were only brought to light through repeated requests from a tenacious nonpartisan taxpayer watchdog group called White Coat Waste Project.
As White Coat Waste Project begins to score political victories, it poses serious questions: Can the organization reshape the conversation around animal research? And if so, how far can WCW go?
